|
About This Author
Come closer.
|
Complex Numbers
Complex Numbers
A complex number is expressed in the standard form a + bi, where a and b are real numbers and i is defined by i^2 = -1 (that is, i is the square root of -1). For example, 3 + 2i is a complex number.
The bi term is often referred to as an imaginary number (though this may be misleading, as it is no more "imaginary" than the symbolic abstractions we know as the "real" numbers). Thus, every complex number has a real part, a, and an imaginary part, bi.
Complex numbers are often represented on a graph known as the "complex plane," where the horizontal axis represents the infinity of real numbers, and the vertical axis represents the infinity of imaginary numbers. Thus, each complex number has a unique representation on the complex plane: some closer to real; others, more imaginary. If a = b, the number is equal parts real and imaginary.
Very simple transformations applied to numbers in the complex plane can lead to fractal structures of enormous intricacy and astonishing beauty.
December 7, 2007 at 10:15pm December 7, 2007 at 10:15pm
| |
I get really, really tired of all the "news" articles that follow the format:
Our society has an obesity problem because *shakes Magic 8-Ball* there's too much sugar in our diets! (or too many fats, too much carbs, too much soda, too little self-restraint, or whatever)
But this one I'm about to link actually makes a good point. I've noticed for a long time that when I try to eat healthy, I end up broke and thinner, but when I don't give a damn my wallet and I both get fat. This article actually applies observational data and draws a somewhat scientific conclusion:
Calorie for calorie, junk foods not only cost less than fruits and vegetables, but junk food prices also are less likely to rise as a result of inflation.
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/12/05/a-high-price-for-healthy-food/?f=1
As I implied above, I'm getting sick of hearing about how fat we are as a society and the mad scramble to find excuses why. Me, I have very little self-control when it comes to food; but I've learned to live with that and am finding ways around the problem. It never helps that no one seems to be able to make up their minds about what's good for you and what isn't. It used to be meat that was the boogeyman; for a while, it was fats; then carbs; then it turns out that some carbs are okay, and, hey, some fats are okay - as long as they're not trans fats. Believe it or not, for a while there, eggs (I call them 'cackleberries') were seen as the root of all dietary evil.
I strongly suspect that a large fraction of the "studies" commissioned to find out what is and isn't good for you are bought and paid for by various special-interest groups. Like, vegetable growers might get a study done that says meat is bad for you. The wheat industry gets together and does a study that denounces fats. Crisco buys a study that says fats are just fine; but don't eat white bread. That sort of thing.
And I still don't understand why sodium compounds are supposed to be evil.
Anyway, if that article has any validity, we get to the root of the problem: simple economics.
Now excuse me while I go eat a bag of pretzels. |
December 7, 2007 at 4:19pm December 7, 2007 at 4:19pm
| |
...that the world is utterly, irrevocably whacked.
Okay, actually it's proof that the people in the world that are utterly whacked. I mean, I was wrong: it's not just Brazil after all.
http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/03/yahoo-top-searches-2007-please-people-stop-...
Really, the headline says everything that needs to be said: Please, People, Stop Typing Britney Spears Into Search Boxes
I'll say it again: FUCKING STOP TYPING BRITNEY SPEARS INTO SEARCH BOXES.
Typical conversation for me:
Them: "Did you see where Britney-"
Me: "SHUT UP! Who cares?"
Them: "..."
But Them's right, and I'm wrong. It's not "Who cares?" It's apparently, "Who doesn't care?"
Am I really the only person on the planet who's never typed "Britney Spears" into a search engine?
Emma Watson, sure...
Now on to #2: WWE.
WTF is WWE? I thought to myself. I've never heard of that, but if it comes up #2 on Yahoo! searches, maybe I'm missing something obvious, so... let's give that term just one more hit.
...Rasslin'?
Rasslin' gets more hits than Paris Hilton? I don't THINK so. And I mean that exactly how it sounds.
That takes care of 2 and 3, but what's that "Naruto" thing at #4? Again, I pander to popular culture by merely searching for it:
Ah. It's about a ninja. That's okay, then.
Then I got to #5 and my mind shut down, so I'll stop there. |
© Copyright 2025 Robert Waltz (UN: cathartes02 at Writing.Com). All rights reserved. Robert Waltz has granted InkSpot.Com, its affiliates and its syndicates non-exclusive rights to display this work.
|